Wikileaks Founder Fears For His Life
June 21, 2010 by politicaltheatrics
Filed under Recent Articles, Western Imperialism
The man behind whistleblower website Wikileaks says he is not in a position to record an interview amid claims his life is in danger.
Julian Assange, the Australian-born founder of Wikileaks, is said to be under threat with reports that the site has hundreds of thousands of classified cables containing explosive revelations.
There was an international uproar in April when the website released classified US military video which officials had been refusing to make public for three years.
The leaked video showed a US helicopter crew mistaking a camera for a rocket-propelled grenade launcher before firing on a group of people in Iraq.
Mr Assange has also told his supporters he is planning to release a video of a US air strike in Afghanistan that killed many civilians.
The 2007 video of the US army helicopter shooting civilians has already led to a chain of events which reportedly has Mr Assange in hiding.
A hacker blew the whistle on the US army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, who allegedly handed that video to Wikileaks.
Mr Manning is now reported to be in custody in Kuwait.
The hacker says Mr Manning bragged to him about having thousands of diplomatic cables that would embarrass US secretary of state Hillary Clinton and several thousand diplomats around the world.
It has since been reported that American officials are searching for Mr Assange to pressure him not to publish the cables.
But an unnamed source in the Obama administration has told Newsweek that the US government is not trying to convince Mr Assange not to release the cables, but it is trying to contact him.
The World Today has also received an email from Mr Assange which says: “Due to present circumstances, I am not able to easily conduct interviews”.
In an email to supporters this week, Mr Assange denies Wikileaks has 260,000 classified US department cables.
But he confirms the website has a video of a US air strike on a village in western Afghanistan in May last year.
The Afghan government said at the time of the attack that 140 civilians died.
Life in danger
Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked Pentagon papers in the 1970s showing government deceit over the Vietnam War, says he believes Mr Assange has reason to keep his whereabouts secret.
“I think it’s worth mentioning [that there is] a very new and ominous development in our country,” he said.
“I think he would not be safe, even physically, entirely wherever he is.
“We have, after all, for the first time ever perhaps in any democratic country… a president who has announced that he feels he has the right to use special operations operatives against anyone abroad that he thinks is associated with terrorism.”
Mr Ellsberg told a US TV network Mr Assange’s life may be in danger.
“I was, in fact, the subject of a White House hit squad in November on May 3, 1972,” he said.
“A dozen Cuban assets were brought up from Miami with orders, quoting their prosecutor ‘to incapacitate Daniel Ellsberg totally’ on the steps of the Capitol.
“It so happens when I was in a rally during the Vietnam war and I asked the prosecutor ‘what does that mean – kill me?’ He said the words were to incapacitate you totally, but you should understand these guys, meaning the CIA operatives, never use the word ‘kill’.”
Professor Amin Saikal, director of the centre for Arab and Islamic studies at the Australian National University, says the US government has strong motivations for keeping video of the strike under wraps.
“That NATO operation in western Afghanistan caused quite a number of civilian casualties which caused outrage among the Afghan leaders,” he said.
“The issue was also raised very strongly in the Afghan parliament.
“I suppose that the American authorities would be very adverse at the release of the video at this point which could cause more problems in the relationship between Afghanistan and Washington.”
As far fetched as Mr Ellsberg’s claim sounds, the national president of Whistleblowers Australia, Peter Bennett, agrees Mr Assange’s life may be at risk.
“There is a lot of money to be made from wars. There is a lot of people who will become very, very wealthy through the course of this Afghan war,” he said.
“To stop anybody raising questions about its conduct would put those profits at risk and profit is a high motivation to stop somebody interfering with those profits.
“It is possible that there are vested interests – military, political and certainly economic, possibly even criminal – who would rather him not release that information.
“There is a serious chance that his wellbeing could be at risk. If I was in his shoes, I would be taking all necessary precautions to make sure that my whereabouts and my wellbeing were being protected.”
Notes/Sources:
The above article was written by Simon Lauder; entitled: “Wikileaks Founder Fears For His Life”










I don't get it … why doesn't he just go ahead and release the video? Wouldn't it be like turning on a light and watching the cockroaches run for cover? In any event he is the one who must decide what is best for him. May the Divine Energies watch over and protect this man.
My advice to Assange: dump everything you have onto the internet right now!
The U.S. government only kills whistle-blowers *before they can act.* Once you've uploaded them, bothering you will just underline the truth of what you've uploaded. Upload everything you have to a public forum *now,* and then go on a TV show explaining that you have no files that you haven't disclosed.
Patriots to our Constitution are not a rare breed. Access to open media such as the public airwaves have cleverly been monopolized by swine. They intentionally did the Exxon Valdez spill, the 9-11 attacks and this oil well blow-out in the Gulf of Mexico. Yes, they all have a commonality. Find it .Recheck and recheck until you really believe it. React with your fellow countrymen and the righteous to put them down, and we will be justified in taxing the hell out of every stinking punk that does not want to help us.
Have a nice day.
Dump it all and then what? Nonsense. He needs to publish carefully, and always keep enough leverage to negotiate his way out of a corner.
Mr Assange is a conundrum.He is currently the most important person on earth,and the least important (Wikileaks will survive and grow without him).I personally hope he takes great care and wish him all the luck in the world,as people with his kind of horse power to stick it to the cowardly,torturing ameriscum bastards are rare indeed.
It's already uploaded.
Assange and people who work with him aren't idiots. They make extensive use of distributed encrypted storage (e.g., freenet) to ensure that the material is not geographically isolated.
I am certain that the Yanks think that Julian is a control freak (because they are) who doesn't trust anybody (because they don't) and who keeps all his critical data on a USB key encrypted with some lame-ass racial-supremacist passage from the Torah (that's what broke the 2007 video encryption – I kid you not).
Also – let's think just how DUMB it is to think that a distributed network can be compromised simply by capturing the 'chief' – what do these fuckwits think this is, a 1950s western, where you kill the guy with the big head-dress and all the other braves stop attacking the wagon? That was never true, but Yank political dimwits believe it almost to the detriment of all other tactics. Hence the whole 'decapitation strike' "schlock and bore"…
The thing that is the most shocking – to me – is the absurdly amateurish encryption protocols used by the US military and State departments: it's as if they think they don't have to bother actually making stuff secure. My e-mail backups have better security than those State cables.
See you in the gulag.
Cheerio
GT
I'm not afraid of them. Have him send them to me and I'll take care of it on multiple sites. I don't think there's any doubt I'll do it or that I know people who will also and who have a wide reach and are trustworthy. This is not the smartest way to get this information out but I don't know how to reach him otherwise. Anyone who does should inform him or a trusted associate that I'd be glad to help.
Really fearing, i think. If i`m in Wikileaks founder place, i will feel fear too.
little out of date. He just gave an interview to the Guardian.
(this form wont let me post the url but its dated June 21) Notice that he does not feel in fear for his life but he feels he cannot visit the USA, 'Land of the Free'
Hi Dean,
There are two things that you might like to consider:
(1) that the interview was given several days before the heat was turned up; or
(2) that the entire interview was fabricated from whole cloth by the journalist – Judith Miller/Jayson Blair style ('all the news that's fit to make up').
Frankly, by the time anything interesting is on a newpaper site, it's dated – besides which all major papers take their marching orders from the political machines in their own country. I would not trust a newspaper to tell me what was on the television.
Cheers
GT
Oh – one further thing… you might think that once a video or document is decrypted, that it can just be bunged up on a server; not so.
A LOT of additional processing time goes into finding "barium meal" material within files. That is by far the most time-consuming thing.
A 'barium meal' is spook-talk for an old-fashioned mechanism for finding traitors: in addition to normal information flow, you tell each suspected traitor one individual-specific thing, and then establish whether that one thing comes back to you.
Properly done, it is invisible to the target and involves material that is misdirecting. It's a terribly elegant mechanism, and (sadly) awfully good if you deploy it in your personal life (to pass from 'acquaintance' to 'mate' to 'friend' in my life involves several such tests… sad how many people fail the first test, really).
In the modern crypto context, it will be an embedded electronic 'signature' for individual copies of documents – usually identifying the server and/or the user details… which makes it easy for the bad guys to plug their leaks.
So the file must be 'shredded' – effectively, clipping out chunks of the file and seeing if it still renders. (The actual mechanism is far smarter than that – but there's little point in writing an excursus on optimal testing).
So BE PATIENT. The amount of material in the hands of the Good Guys is growing at a staggering rate: all of it will see the light of day in due course.
And lastly – do NOT trust Iceland as a 'haven'. Iceland is administered by politicians, and politicians are – everywhere – the LAST people you should ever trust to keep their word. As an example – the US has a CONSTITUTIONAL prohibition on illegal detention, cruel and unusual punishment, and search and siezure… which is not repsected one iota. Iceland's political class will throw haven-seekers under a bus the moment it becomes expedient to do so.
Cheerio
GT